mirror of https://github.com/01-edu/Branch-AI.git
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
72 lines
3.2 KiB
72 lines
3.2 KiB
Citation Request: |
|
This dataset is public available for research. The details are described in [Cortez et al., 2009]. |
|
Please include this citation if you plan to use this database: |
|
|
|
P. Cortez, A. Cerdeira, F. Almeida, T. Matos and J. Reis. |
|
Modeling wine preferences by data mining from physicochemical properties. |
|
In Decision Support Systems, Elsevier, 47(4):547-553. ISSN: 0167-9236. |
|
|
|
Available at: [@Elsevier] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.05.016 |
|
[Pre-press (pdf)] http://www3.dsi.uminho.pt/pcortez/winequality09.pdf |
|
[bib] http://www3.dsi.uminho.pt/pcortez/dss09.bib |
|
|
|
1. Title: Wine Quality |
|
|
|
2. Sources |
|
Created by: Paulo Cortez (Univ. Minho), Antonio Cerdeira, Fernando Almeida, Telmo Matos and Jose Reis (CVRVV) @ 2009 |
|
|
|
3. Past Usage: |
|
|
|
P. Cortez, A. Cerdeira, F. Almeida, T. Matos and J. Reis. |
|
Modeling wine preferences by data mining from physicochemical properties. |
|
In Decision Support Systems, Elsevier, 47(4):547-553. ISSN: 0167-9236. |
|
|
|
In the above reference, two datasets were created, using red and white wine samples. |
|
The inputs include objective tests (e.g. PH values) and the output is based on sensory data |
|
(median of at least 3 evaluations made by wine experts). Each expert graded the wine quality |
|
between 0 (very bad) and 10 (very excellent). Several data mining methods were applied to model |
|
these datasets under a regression approach. The support vector machine model achieved the |
|
best results. Several metrics were computed: MAD, confusion matrix for a fixed error tolerance (T), |
|
etc. Also, we plot the relative importances of the input variables (as measured by a sensitivity |
|
analysis procedure). |
|
|
|
4. Relevant Information: |
|
|
|
The two datasets are related to red and white variants of the Portuguese "Vinho Verde" wine. |
|
For more details, consult: http://www.vinhoverde.pt/en/ or the reference [Cortez et al., 2009]. |
|
Due to privacy and logistic issues, only physicochemical (inputs) and sensory (the output) variables |
|
are available (e.g. there is no data about grape types, wine brand, wine selling price, etc.). |
|
|
|
These datasets can be viewed as classification or regression tasks. |
|
The classes are ordered and not balanced (e.g. there are munch more normal wines than |
|
excellent or poor ones). Outlier detection algorithms could be used to detect the few excellent |
|
or poor wines. Also, we are not sure if all input variables are relevant. So |
|
it could be interesting to test feature selection methods. |
|
|
|
5. Number of Instances: red wine - 1599; white wine - 4898. |
|
|
|
6. Number of Attributes: 11 + output attribute |
|
|
|
Note: several of the attributes may be correlated, thus it makes sense to apply some sort of |
|
feature selection. |
|
|
|
7. Attribute information: |
|
|
|
For more information, read [Cortez et al., 2009]. |
|
|
|
Input variables (based on physicochemical tests): |
|
1 - fixed acidity |
|
2 - volatile acidity |
|
3 - citric acid |
|
4 - residual sugar |
|
5 - chlorides |
|
6 - free sulfur dioxide |
|
7 - total sulfur dioxide |
|
8 - density |
|
9 - pH |
|
10 - sulphates |
|
11 - alcohol |
|
Output variable (based on sensory data): |
|
12 - quality (score between 0 and 10) |
|
|
|
8. Missing Attribute Values: None
|
|
|